翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Mark Kingdon
・ Mark Kingston
・ Mark Kingston (baseball)
・ Mark Kingwell
・ Mark Kinnear
・ Mark Kinsella
・ Mark Kinser
・ Mark Kinsey Stephenson
・ Mark Kiptoo
・ Mark Kirchner
・ Mark Kirk
・ Mark Kirkeby
・ Mark Kirkland
・ Mark Kirnarsky
・ Mark Kirton
Mark Kishlansky
・ Mark Kisin
・ Mark Kistler
・ Mark Kistler's Imagination Station
・ Mark Kitching
・ Mark Kittleson
・ Mark Kitto
・ Mark Kiyimba
・ Mark Kjeldsen
・ Mark Klein
・ Mark Klein (singer)
・ Mark Kleinschmidt
・ Mark Kleinschmidt (politician)
・ Mark Klempner
・ Mark Klett


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Mark Kishlansky : ウィキペディア英語版
Mark Kishlansky

Mark Kishlansky (October 11, 1948 - May 19, 2015) was a historian of seventeenth-century British politics. He was the Frank Baird, Jr. Professor of History at Harvard University.
==Education and academic career==
Kishlansky was born in Brooklyn, New York. He completed his undergraduate degree at the State University of New York at Stony Brook in 1970. He proceeded to graduate study under David Underdown at Brown University, receiving his M.A. in 1972 and his PhD in 1977. His PhD thesis was titled "The Emergence of Radical Politics in the English Revolution". From 1975 to 1991 he taught at the University of Chicago, successively as instructor and professor. From 1990 to 1991 he was a member of the Committee on Social Thought. He was a visiting professor at Northwestern University in 1983 and was the Mellon Visiting Professor in the Humanities and Social Sciences at the California Institute of Technology in 1990–91. In 1991 he became a professor at Harvard University and from 1997 to 2001 served as Associate Dean of the Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Harvard. He was editor of the ''Journal of British Studies'' from 1984 to 1991 and editor-in-chief of ''History Compass'' from 2003 to 2009.
Along with Kevin Sharpe, Conrad Russell and John Morrill, Kishlansky pioneered the revisionist interpretation of early Stuart history. Unlike previous scholars who had seen the Civil Wars of the 1640s as stemming from the growth of ideological opposition to the Stuart monarchs over the previous half-century, the revisionists argued that an ideological consensus had prevailed at least until the early 1620s. This consensus, in their view, was unsettled in the late 1620s and afterwards by religious disputes and by the crown's fiscal problems. The revisionist school sought to counter interpretations of the English Civil Wars that had been advanced by historians influenced by Marxist and Whiggish models of historical development. Kishlansky advanced his interpretation in an article in 1977 in ''The Journal of Modern History''〔Mark Kishlansky, "The Emergence of Adversary Politics in the Long Parliament," ''Journal of Modern History,'' vol. 49 (1977), pp. 617–40.〕 and in two books, ''The Rise of the New Model Army'' (1979) and ''Parliamentary Selection'' (1986).
In the early 1990s Kishlansky became involved in a controversy with the University of Cambridge historian, John Adamson. The controversy began in 1990 when Kishlansky published an article in the ''Historical Journal'' criticising Adamson's use of sources. Kishlansky, contending that Adamson had overstated the influence of Viscount Saye and Sele in the parliamentary politics of the mid-1640s, titled his article "Saye What?"〔Mark A. Kishlansky, "Saye What?" ''Historical Journal'', vol. 33 (1990), pp. 917–937.〕 Adamson responded with an article entitled "Politics and the Nobility in Civil-War England"〔J.S.A. Adamson, "Politics and the Nobility in Civil-War England," ''Historical Journal'', vol. 34 (1991), pp. 231–255.〕 and Kishlansky responded reiterating his case with an article titled "Saye No More".〔Mark A. Kishlansky, "Saye No More," ''Journal of British Studies'', vol. 30 (1991), pp. 399–448.〕 This was followed by an exchange of letters in the ''Times Literary Supplement'' in 1992, provoked by a review written by Lawrence Stone that mentioned the controversy. A series of historians commented on the debate in the letters pages of the ''TLS'', including Conrad Russell, Hugh Trevor-Roper, Kishlansky and Adamson. All this was covered in the British press, with ''The Times'' describing it as a "fierce high table row"〔''The Times'' (London), 21 February 1992.〕 and ''The Independent'' calling it a "most uncivil war".〔''The Independent'' (London), 1 March 1992.〕 ''The Sunday Times'' described it as a "historians' brawl" that had "shocked the academic community".〔''The Sunday Times'' (London), 23 February 1992.〕
In addition to his publications on Stuart history, Kishlansky has co-authored a number of textbooks, most notably ''Civilization in the West'' (with Patrick Geary and Patricia O'Brien), ''Societies and Cultures in World History'' (with Patrick Geary, Patricia O'Brien and R. Bin Wong), and ''The Unfinished Legacy'' (with Patrick Geary and Patricia O'Brien). He is a consulting editor for Prentice-Hall and has served as a consulting editor for Longman Publications (2006–08), HarperCollins (1990–96), Scott, Foresman Co. (1987–89) and George Allen & Unwin (1984–86).

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Mark Kishlansky」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.